Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-42042: [Java] Update Unit Tests for Compressions Module #42044

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2024

Conversation

llama90
Copy link
Contributor

@llama90 llama90 commented Jun 9, 2024

Rationale for this change

Update package from JUnit 4(org.junit) to JUnit 5(org.junit.jupiter).

What changes are included in this PR?

  • Replacing org.junit with org.junit.jupiter.api.
  • Updating Assertions.assertXXX to assertXXX using static imports
  • Updating annotations such as @After.
    • @After -> @AfterEach
  • Doing self review

Are these changes tested?

Yes, existing tests have passed.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

@llama90 llama90 requested a review from lidavidm as a code owner June 9, 2024 15:42
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 9, 2024

⚠️ GitHub issue #42042 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

Copy link
Collaborator

@vibhatha vibhatha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this one @llama90. LGTM!

@vibhatha
Copy link
Collaborator

vibhatha commented Jun 9, 2024

cc @lidavidm PR LGTM, Could please take a look?

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Jun 9, 2024
@lidavidm lidavidm merged commit 7c15568 into apache:main Jun 10, 2024
17 checks passed
@lidavidm lidavidm removed the awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review label Jun 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label Jun 10, 2024
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 7c15568.

There was 1 benchmark result indicating a performance regression:

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 10 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants